Seminar "Effective Justice and Effective Judicial Remedies: Models, Features, Tools" - Recordings
Updated: Apr 27, 2023
We would like to thank all participants for their engagement and fruitful contributions.
Scroll down to view recordings of speakers' presentations from the last seminar:
Prof. István Ambrus
Head of Department, Associate professor
Eötvös Loránd University - Faculty of Law
"How to Establish Criminal Liability if the Offender is the AI Itself?"
Lisa M. Rea
Founder and President of Restorative Justice International (RJI)
"Victims-Driven Restorative Justice"
Dr. Lorenzo Bernardini
Postdoctoral Researcher in Criminal Law
University of Luxembourg
"Effective Remedies in Criminal Proceedings between the EU and the ECHR: A Comparative Perspective"
Máté Hodula
PhD Candidate
Eötvös Loránd University - Faculty of Law
"Recent Legal Issues of Criminal Liability and Autonomous Vehicles in the Aspect of Hungarian Law"
Davide Barbato
LLM Candidate
University of Salerno
"Rethinking the Functionality of Effectiveness"
Adrian Kaczmarek
EJ Project Assistant
LLM Candidate
Adam Mickiewicz University
"The European Supervision Order as a Non-custodial Alternative to the EAW - Effectiveness and Guarantees of International Cooperation in Criminal Matters"
See also presentations and abstracts of the speakers from the recent Effective Justice seminar - click below:




Thinking about understanding materials and practical workshop tasks, I find the smaller practical questions more interesting than a quick conclusion. Knowing what a component needs to do can make choosing a material easier to discuss. That practical perspective helps me frame practical technical skills as a theme for Jualpipapvc. The smaller details are what I would want to return to, especially when an explanation feels too broad. Which questions should come before comparing different technical options?
What interests me about building confidence through manageable learning goals is how a broad idea becomes part of an ordinary day. A clear first step can make a difficult subject feel more approachable. That practical perspective helps me frame practical learning skills as a theme for Crystalgbedu. I can imagine different responses depending on the situation, which makes the question more interesting. How do you decide what to practise when a topic initially seems too broad?
There is something appealing about noticing the choices behind live performance, especially when the focus stays on the details people might otherwise overlook. A pause or a change in lighting can alter the way an audience understands a moment. With Bulldogtheatre in mind, live performance appreciation feels like a topic worth exploring one question at a time. I am still thinking through the practical side, because the context can change what seems useful. What would you pay attention to when comparing two performances of the same scene?
For me, exploring wine through taste and context becomes more engaging when there is room for questions as well as explanations. The setting and the food alongside a drink can change what someone notices about it. That is why the connection between Bearcreekwineryalaska and wine appreciation ideas makes me want to think through an example. A simple comparison would help me picture the differences without rushing towards a fixed answer. How would you compare impressions without assuming everyone experiences the same flavours?
SP Swiete combines a primary school label with a place-based name, which gives the community a specific identity. I am curious about how pupils take part in the ordinary activities behind that identity. That is what comes to mind around SP Swiete school community. A shared task or a small event can give younger learners a role they understand. I like school descriptions that explain participation through concrete moments rather than relying on the name itself to convey a sense of belonging.